>>> THIS IS METRO FOCUS WITH --
BROUGHT TO YOU BY --
>>> THIS IS "METROFOCUS" WITH
RAFAEL PI ROMAN, JACK FORD, AND
JENNA FLANAGAN.
>> "METROFOCUS" IS MADE POSSIBLE
BY
SUE AND EDGAR WACHENHEIM III,
SYLVIA A. AND SIMON B. POYTA
PROGRAMING ENDOWMENT TO FIGHT
ANTI-SEMITISM.
BARBARA HOPE ZUCKERBERG,
JANET PRINDLE SEIDLER,
JODY AND JOHN ARNHOLD,
CHERYL AND PHILIP MILSTEIN
FAMILY,
BERNARD AND DENISE SCHWARTZ,
JUDY AND JOSH WESTON,
DR. ROBERT C. AND TINA SOHN
FOUNDATION.
>>> TONIGHT WE ARE TAKING YOU
INSIDE THE BATTLE TO RADICALIZE
THESE MOVEMENTS.
THESE ARE AT THE HEART OF A
DOCUMENTARY ENTITLED "HEALING
FROM HATE."
THIS FILM BRINGS US TO THE FRONT
LINES WITH LIFE AFTER HATE
FOUNDED BY FORMER SKINHEADS AND
NEONAZIS TO HEAL.
HERE IS A PREVIEW WITH A WARNING
THAT SOME OF THE SCENES ARE IN
FACT DISTURBING.
♪
>> WE WERE HERE FIRST AND THIS
IS OUR COUNTRY.
>> I AM ON THE EDGE TO SAVE THE
WHITE RACE.
GUNS, AMMO, STEEL-TOED SHOES.
>> THEY KNEW THEY WANTED TO HELP
OTHER GUYS GET OUT.
>> HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE, WHILE IN
THE MOVEMENT, ARE TOO AFRAID TO
LEAVE.
>> I WAS GETTING COMPASSION FROM
THOSE I LEAST DESERVED IT FROM
WHEN I LEAST DESERVED IT.
>> THIS IS WHY THE INTERSENSE
CAN'T RELY ON CHARISMA.
>> WE ARE LIKE ANTI-VENOM.
WE KNOW HOW TO SPEW IT.
>> YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN SO BADLY
BROKEN THAT THERE IS NO WAY YOU
COULD COME BACK FROM THIS.
IF YOU DID, SO COULD HE.
>> SOMEONE IN THAT LIFE THAT MAY
NOT BE AWARE THERE IS A WAY OUT.
>> THAT HATE RUINS YOU.
>> HUMANIZED HIM WHICH ALLOWED
HIM TO HUMANIZE YOU.
THAT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
>> A LOT GETTING THROWN AT YOU
RIGHT NOW.
>> A LOT.
>> IRREPLACEABLE.
>> WE ARE OPERATING AS HUMAN
BEINGS IN ONE OF TWO PLACES,
HERE OR LOVE.
WE GET TO CHOOSE WHICH ONE THAT
IS.
♪
>> JOINING US NOW TO DISCUSS THE
DOCUMENTARY AND THE WORK THEY
HAVE BEEN DOING IS FIRST THE
DOCUMENTARY'S WRITER, PRODUCER,
AND AN AUTHOR FOR THE BOOK "A
CURE FOR HATE."
FROM VIOLENT EXTREMISM TO
COMPASSION.
WELCOME TO BOTH OF YOU.
PETER, I AM GOING TO ASK YOU THE
FIRST QUESTION.
IT'S A QUESTION THAT I
OFTENTIMES ASK FILMMAKERS.
THAT IS WHAT IS IT ABOUT THE
STORY ABOUT WHAT'S BEEN GOING ON
IN SOCIETY THAT DREW YOU AND
MADE YOU DECIDE THIS WAS THE
FILM I WANT TO MAKE?
>> IT'S INTERESTING.
OSTENSIBLY THIS IS A FILM ABOUT
HATE, BUT NOT THE AVENUE I
INITIALLY TOOK IN TERMS OF WHAT
MY INTENTIONS WERE.
I HAD BEEN DEVELOPING A FILM
AROUND MASCULINITY AND THE
CRISIS OF IT AROUND THE UNITED
STATES AND COLLABORATING WITH
MICHAEL KIMBALL WHO APPEARS IN
THE FILM.
OVER A SOURCE OF A SERIES OF
DISCUSSIONS, HE BROUGHT UP THE
POINT THAT HE HAD STARTED TO DO
RESEARCH FOR A BOOK THAT
INVOLVED MEN WHO WERE EXITING
HATE GROUPS AND HELPING TO
SUPPORT OTHERS TO DO THE SAME.
HE SAID YOU REALLY NEED TO CHECK
THESE GUYS OUT.
THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY FASCINATING
MEN.
AND I THINK THEY REALLY PROVIDE
A VERY USEFUL LENS FOR
UNDERSTANDING MASCULINITY.
AS A SOCIOLOGIST, ONE OF HIS
APROE
APPROACHES IS LET'S LOOK AT THE
EXTREME TO SEE WHAT IS HAPPENING
IN THE CENTER.
HE INTRODUCED ME TO THESE GUYS
AND THAT'S ALL IT TOOK.
THEY HAVE THE MOST REMARKABLE,
POWERFUL, COURAGEOUS STORIES,
AND THEY ARE OUT THERE ENGAGING
IN THIS REALLY COMPLICATED
DYNAMIC AROUND HATE THAT WE ARE
STRUGGLING WITH AS A NATION
RIGHT NOW IN A VERY UNIQUE WAY
WITH EMPATHY AND COMPASSION AND
UNDERSTANDING.
I THINK IT'S INCREDIBLY
IMPORTANT STORY FOR PEOPLE TO
HEAR.
>> IT IS INDEED.
AS AN ASIDE, YEARS AGO I WORKED
FOR ABC NEWS AND DID A STORE FOR
"2020" WOMEN IN HATE GROUPS AND
GETTING INVOLVED AND MEETING
SOME OF THESE WOMEN AND PEOPLE,
YOU GOT A SENSE.
AND THIS WAS 20 YEARS AGO AND
YOU KNOW IT HAS CHANGED IN THAT
TIME, BUT YOU GET A SENSE OF HOW
PERVASIVE THAT LIFESTYLE IS.
SO THE NOTION OF WITHDRAWING
FROM IT IS FASCINATING.
>>> TONY, ALL GOOD FILM MAKING
HAS TO DO WITH PEOPLE AND THEIR
STORY OF AND YOUR STORY I THINK
WILL SURPRISE PEOPLE IN THE
SENSE THAT IF YOU ASK SOMEBODY
ON THE STREET WHO JOINS THESE
GROUPS, THEY WOULD SAY PEOPLE
FROM BROKEN HOMES AND POVERTY
STRICKEN BACKGROUNDS AND YOU
WERE NOT THAT.
YOU WERE FROM A FAIRLY AFFLUENT
LIFESTYLE, YOUR FAMILY WAS A
DOCTOR.
>> WHAT GETS MOST MEN AND WOMEN
INTO IT, AND IT'S A SEARCH FOR A
PURPOSE, A SENSE OF MEANING.
WHAT I GOT FROM THOSE HATE
GROUPS WAS THAT I GOT POWER WHEN
I FELT POWERLESS, ATTENTION WHEN
I FELT INVISIBLE AND ACCEPTANCE
WHEN I FELT UNLOVABLE.
I TALK ABOUT THOSE THINGS IN
TERMS OF TOXIC SHAME.
I THINK THAT'S ALL PART OF HUMAN
CONDITION.
WE ALL DEAL WITH UNHEALTHY
BELIEFS BECAUSE OF WHAT IS SAID
TO US AS CHILDREN AND WE
OVESTRIVE
TO OVERCOME THE LIES, THAT WE
WERE WEAK.
I FOUND PEOPLE THAT WOULD TAKE
ME IN AND PAT ME ON THE BACK AND
WE COULD GO ON THIS HEROIC
STRUGGLE TO SAVE THE WHITE RACE.
IT'S NONSENSICAL WHEN I LOOK
BACK AT IT NOW, BUT IN THE
MOMENT IT WAS VERY REAL AND MADE
ME FEEL WHOLE FOR A LITTLE
WHILE.
THEN IT WORE OFF.
>> PETER, AS YOU VIEWED THIS
STORY, AND ALL DOCUMENTARIES ARE
A JOURNEY OF KNOWLEDGE, YOU HAVE
LEARNED THROUGH THAT.
I AM SURE AS A PRODUCER YOU ARE
LEARNING AS YOU GO THROUGH IT.
LISTENING TO TONY AS TO WHY HE
GOT INVOLVED IN THE FIRST PLACE.
IT RAISES THE QUESTION THAT I
SUSPECT MOST PEOPLE, IF YOU ASK
THEM AGAIN AND SAY WHY DO YOU
THINK PEOPLE GET INVOLVED IN
THESE GROUPS, I SUSPECT YOU KWO
SAY IDEOLOGY.
WHAT DID YOU FIND?
>> THAT'S A MAIN POINT THAT
COMES ACROSS CLEARLY WITH THE
FILM.
INEVITABLY YOU FIND THAT IT IS
NOT THE IDEOLOGY THAT'S DRIVING
PEOPLE INTO HATE GROUP
PARTICIPATION.
AS TONY MENTIONED, IT'S MORE OF
PEOPLE LOOKING FOR BELONGING,
EMPOWERMENT, HOW TO SHORE UP A
LOST SENSE OF MASCULINITY OR
STANDING, HIGHER PURPOSE,
IDENTITY.
IF WE STEP BACK, THESE ARE
CRUCIAL UNDER PININGS FOR
ANYBODY TO FEEL AT PEACE WITHIN
ONE'S SELF.
KIMMEL TALKS ABOUT THESE GROUPS
FEEDING MEN, FEEDING SOMETHING
THAT THEY VERY MUCH NEED.
AND I THINK ONE OF THE CRUCIAL
ASPECTS OF THIS FILM IS IT'S
VERY IMPORTANT TO TAKE A STEP
BACK AND LOOK AT THE PEOPLE
INSIDE OF THESE BODIES.
NOT JUST THEIR BEHAVIOR, NOT
JUST THEIR IDEOLOGY, BUT THAT
THERE ARE HUMAN BEINGS INSIDE
HERE AND REASONS THEY ARE DRIVEN
TO THIS KIND OF BEHAVIOR AND
THIS KIND OF IDENTIFICATION AND
BELONGING.
>> TONY, WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT
YOUR INVOLVEMENT HERE, IT SOUNDS
AS IF YOU INITIALLY FOUND WHAT
YOU WERE LOOKING FOR, THE NEED
THAT PETER JUST MENTIONED.
IT LOOKED LIKE YOU FOUND THE
ANSWERS TO YOUR NEED, BUT AT
SOME POINT IN TIME YOU SAID, NO,
THIS IS NOT WHAT I NEED.
WHAT WAS IT THAT CAUSED THAT
TRANSFORMATION FOR YOU TO MAKE
YOU SAY I NEED TO GET OUT OF
THIS?
>> ULTIMATELY WAS THE BIRTH OF
MY DAUGHTER AND SON 15 MONTHS
LATER.
I ENDED UP BEING A SINGLE PARENT
WHEN THEY WERE 2 AND 4 WHICH
PROVIDED ME, IRONICALLY,
PROVIDED ME WITH ANOTHER
IDENTITY.
BACK IN THE 1990s, BEING A
SINGLE FATHER WAS LIKE A
UNICORN.
I GOT ATTENTION, ACCEPTANCE,
APPROVAL AND ALL OF THOSE
THINGS, BUT IN A HEALTHY WAY.
THE CHILDREN PROVIDED THE
OPPORTUNITY TO THAW MIGHT HEART.
CHILDREN ARE AMAZING IN THE
SENSE THAT THEY ARE SAFE TO
LOVE.
I COULD ALLOW MYSELF TO FEEL.
I WAS SO MUCH I HAD MY HEAD SO
FAR, IT WASN'T FUNNY.
CUT OFF FROM MY HEART.
THE REASON PEOPLE DO THAT IS
BECAUSE THEY LEARN IT'S NOT TO
CLOSE THEM.
SO WE ARMOR THEM.
SO FOR ME, I COULD LOVE MY
CHILDREN WITHOUT ANY FEAR OF
BEING HURT.
THAT ALLOWED ME TO CONNECT.
THE CHILDREN THROUGH THEIR EYES
I SAW MY OWN HUMANITY REFLECTED
BACK AT ME AND BECAME AWARE,
SLOWLY, OF THAT.
THAT'S THE GIFT MY CHILDREN GAVE
TO ME, THE FIRST LESSON IN
COMPASSION.
WITH COMPASSION WE HOLD A MAIRRR
UP AND SEE THE REFLECTION BACK.
THAT'S WHAT KICKED IT OFF, MY
CHILDREN.
IT TOOK YEARS BEFORE I GOT OUT.
THERE WAS THIS TENSION AND POWER
STRUGGLE GOING ON INSIDE.
THE THING TO REMEMBER IS IT IS
NOT REALLY THE IDEOLOGY.
THE IDEOLOGY WAS A PILL I HAD TO
SWALLOW TO GET NEEDS MET.
DON'T GET ME WRONG, I DOVE IN
AND BELIEVED IT.
BUT IDEOLOGY AND IDENTITY COME
TOGETHER.
IF YOU ATTACK IDEOLOGY, IT IS
ALSO ATTACKING THEIR IDENTITY.
THE CHILDREN ALLOWED ME TO HAVE
A SEPARATE IDENTITY FROM THE
IDEOLOGY SO THAT WAS KEY FOR ME
TO LEAVE.
>> WHEN DO YOU APPROACH PEOPLE?
THIS IS A POWERFUL, THOUGHT
PROVOKING, MARVELOUSLY PRODUCED
FILM.
PEOPLE SHOULD SEE THIS.
I AM CURIOUS ABOUT WHEN YOU NOW
APPROACH SOMEBODY WHO IS DEEPLY
ENMESHED IN THESE MOVEMENTS, SO
TO SPEAK, WHAT IS THE RESPONSE
YOU GET FROM PEOPLE?
>> WELL, I THINK THE THING THAT
WE DO.
PEOPLE ASK WHAT IS THE FIRST
THING YOU SAY TO A WHITE
SUPREMACIST.
IT IS NOT THE FIRST THING I DO,
BUT WHAT I DO.
LISTEN.
>> HOW DO YOU GET THEM TO TALK
SO THIS CAN BE A MEANINGFUL
LISTENING FOR YOU?
>> JUST BE CURIOUS.
YOU CAN'T DO IT WITH SOMEONE WHO
DOESN'T WANT TO ENGAGE YOU IN
ANYWAY, NO, I AM NOT TALKING TO
YOU.
USUALLY BY THE TIME WE TALK TO
THEM THEY HAVE THAT SENSE OF
DOUBT AND THAT INTERNAL TENSION
IS ALIVE AND WELL INSIDE THEM.
ASK THEM QUESTIONS.
WHAT DO THEY BELIEVE AND WHY DO
THEY BELIEVE IT.
OFTEN PEOPLE HAVE THE PERCEPTION
OF LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES.
WHERE THEY GO WITH THOSE ARE
ILLEGITIMATE.
A LOT OF TIMES THESE YOUNG MEN
AND WOMEN HAVEN'T HAD THE
OPPORTUNITY TO TALK ABOUT WHAT
THEIR GRIEVANCE IS.
IT GETS STUFFED INSIDE AND
SPILLED OUT ALL OVER THE PLACE.
IT IS PROVIDING A SAFE PLACE TO
ALLOW THAT VULNERABILITY TO
HAPPEN.
ONCE YOU ALLOW SUNDAY TO EXPRESS
THEMSELVES IN A SAFE PLACE, THE
WALLS COME DOWN SO WE CAN MOVE
BEYOND THAT.
>> I WANT TO REMIND FOLKS WEE AE
TALKING ABOUT THE DOCUMENTARY,
"DEALING WITH HATE."
AND WE HAVE THE PRODUCER AND
ALSO AN AUTHOR WHO WAS A FORMER
WHITE SUPREMACIST.
YOU ARE A WRITER IN ADDITION TO
A FILMMAKER.
YOUR REACTIONS TO WATCHING THIS
PROCESS, THIS ATTEMPT, REACHING
OUT TO PEOPLE AND SAYING TO
THEM, LET ME LISTEN TO YOU IN
THE HOPES THAT I CAN BRING YOU
OUT OF THIS.
TELL ME ABOUT THAT.
>> I WAS GOING TO PIGGYBACK ON
TO WHAT TONY WAS TALKING ABOUT.
THAT IS ONE OF THE MOST
IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF THIS FILM.
IT COMES THROUGH WHEN YOU HEAR
SOME OF THESE GENTLEMEN'S
STORIES.
WHEN YOU HEAR FRANKIE WHOM THE
FILM IS LOOSELY BASED ON, AND
WHEN YOU HEAR SAMMY AS WELL,
THEY TALK ABOUT THE FIRST TIME
SOMEONE REALLY SAT AND LISTENED
TO THEIR STORIES WAS A
TRANSFORMTIVE EXPERIENCE FOR
THEM.
AS A FILMMAKER AND A FORMER
COUNSELOR AND THERAPIST MYSELF,
MY ROUTE TO FILM MAKING IS A
SE
SECURE ITOUS ONE.
IT IS NOT JUST LISTENING, BUT
BEING GENUINELY CURIOUS ABOUT AN
INDIVIDUAL.
PEOPLE KNOW THE DIFFERENCE.
YOU CAN LISTEN, BUT HAVING A
GENUINE CURIOSITY IS A
COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MODE OF
LISTENING.
I THINK IN ORDER TO HELP SOMEONE
FEEL UNDERSTOOD AND VALIDATED
FOR WHO THEY ARE AND THEIR
EXPERIENCES, THAT IS A REALLY
KEY INGREDIENT IN ANY KIND OF
INTERACTION.
>> TONY, YOU WERE VERY
INSTRUMENTAL IN THE NOTION OF
THE INTERNET AND USING THE
INTERNET.
THIS GOES BACK DECADES.
USING THE INTERNET AS AN
EDUCATIONAL TOOL.
TALK ABOUT THE SUCCESS YOU HAD
THEN AND HOW TODAY YOU VIEW THE
INTERNET AS THAT RECRUITING
TOOL, THAT INFORMATION TOOL.
>> SURE.
I FELT ONE BUILT ONE OF THE FIR
WHITE POWER RECORD COMPANIES.
THEY WERE MAIL ORDER DVDs.
USING THE INTERNET WE ALLOWED
PEOPLE TO LISTEN TO MUSIC.
IT IS NOT LIKE STREAMING TODAY.
Y
YOU COULD HEAR MUSIC YOU NEVER
HEARD BEFORE BEFORE BUYING.
IT RAMPED UP THE SALES.
THAT'S WHAT SOCIAL MEDIA DOES.
YOU CAN ACCESS PEOPLE WITH THE
SAME IDEAS AS YOU MUCH, MUCH
EASIER.
WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN LONELY, ANGRY
KID SITTING IN A BASEMENT IN THE
'90s IS NOW A COMMUNITY OF
LONELY ANGRY KIDS SITTING IN THE
BASEMENT NOW CONNECTED THROUGH
SOCIAL MEDIA.
THEY CAN THEN WIELD THE POWER IN
NUMBERS.
I THINK SOCIAL MEDIA DOES IT FOR
THE REST OF US FOR GOOD.
BUT THOSE WHO USE IT FOR
NEFARIOUS PURPOSES IS QUITE
POWERFUL.
>> IT TALKS ABOUT THIS IN-DEPTH
IN THE FILM AND I THINK IT'S AN
IMPORTANT POINT.
THERE WAS A TIME WHEN
INVOLVEMENT IN ONE OF THESE
GROUPS WAS A POTENTIALLY
DANGEROUS ACTIVITY.
IT WAS A VERY PUBLIC THING.
I MEAN YOU HAD TO GO LEAVE YOUR
HOUSE AND GO TO A MEETING IN --
SOMETIMES IN A VERY PUBLIC
PLACE.
THERE ARE TIMES WHEN YOU HAD TO
DEAL WITH PROTESTERS AND
AGITATORS WHO WERE VERY MUCH
OPPOSED TO WHAT WAS GOING ON.
THERE WAS A DANGER IN THAT.
NOT JUST A DANGER, BUT THE
THREAT OF EXPOSURE.
YOU COULDN'T DO IT BEHIND THIS
WALL OF INVISIBILITY THAT THE
INTERNET PROVIDES.
I THINK IT'S COMPLETELY
DIFFERENT BALL GAME BECAUSE
THOSE -- IT PROVIDES PEOPLE WITH
A MUCH LOWER LEVEL OF RISK TO
GET INVOLVED AND REALLY ENGAGE
AROUND THESE IDEAS.
I THINK THAT THAT'S -- WITHOUT
HAVING THAT SORT OF -- I GUESS
YOU WOULD CALL IT SOCIETAL
BALANCE OR CORRECTIVE, IT CAN BE
AN INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS THING.
YOU TALKED ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED,
TONY.
IT CAN START WITH GOOGLING A
SIMPLE PHRASE.
WHICH I THINK HIS WAS BLACK AND
WHITE CRIMES AND TOOK HIM DOWN
THIS RABBIT HOLE WHICH LED HIM
TO THIS HORRIBLE, HORRIBLE
BUTCHERY.
>> TONY, LET ME ASK YOU THIS, TO
FOLLOW UP ON THIS.
I SAID IN MY INTRODUCTION.
I TALKED ABOUT A SURGE THAT WE
ARE SEEING IN HATE CRIMES AND
VIOLENCE.
WE HAVE MENTIONED THE ROLE OF
THE INTERNET AND HOW IT CAN
ALLOW PEOPLE, AS PETER SAID, YOU
DON'T HAVE TO GO OUT SOMEPLACE
TO A MEETING.
YOU HAVE THE MEETING RIGHT THERE
IN YOUR HOME.
BUT IN ADDITION TO THAT, WHAT
WOULD YOU POINT TO IN TERMS OF
SOME OF THE REASONS WHY WE ARE
SEEING THIS UPSURGE IN HATE
CRIMES AND VIOLENCE AND
PARTICIPATION?
>> AS PETER IS ALLUDING TO,
THERE IS A LOWER BARRIER TO
ENTRY AND THE SECOND HALF OF THE
INTERNET IS THE SPEED.
WHEN I WAS IN THE MOVEMENT IN
THE '80S AND '90s, IT TOOK
MONTHS IF NOT YEARS TO FULLY
IMMERSE AND BECOME FULLY
RADICALIZED INTO THIS IDEOLOGY.
YOU HAD TO ORDER BOOKS AND WAIT
WEEKS OR A MONTH TO COME.
BUT NOW WITH THE INTERNET PEOPLE
CAN BING WATCH THE IDEOLOGY IN A
WEEK OR TWO.
I THINK THAT RAPID ACCELERATION
IS A DANGEROUS THING.
AND I THINK IN TERMS OF SORT OF
A NATIONAL CONVERSATION, I THINK
THESE ELEMENTS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN
IN SOCIETY.
I AM NOT ENTIRELY CONVINCED THAT
IT'S GROWING, BUT THE VISIBILITY
SURE IS.
>> OKAY.
PETER, LET ME ASK YOU TO WEIGH
IN ON THIS.
A LITTLE DIFFERENT, BUT AS A
PERSON WHO CHRONICLES SOCIETY,
AS A FILMMAKER, A PERSON WHO
LOOKS THROUGH YOUR LENS, IF YOU
WILL.
WE HAVE HEARD CRITICISM LEVELED
AT THE ADMINISTRATION IN
WASHINGTON -- CLAIMS BEING
MADE -- THAT WORDS THAT ARE
BEING USED, ATTITUDES, POINT TO
CHARLOTTESVILLE AND PRESIDENT
TRUMP SAYING GOOD PEOPLE ON BOTH
SIDES AND OTHER INSTANCES AND WE
ARE HEARING PEOPLE SAY THAT IS
HELPING TO FAN THE FLAMES.
IS THAT POLITICAL ATTACKS OR DO
YOU SEE A LEGITIMACY TO THIS
TYPE OF CRITICISM THAT WORDS
FROM LEADERS SUCH AS THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
CAN LEND CREDENCE AND GIVE
MOMENTUM TO MOVEMENTS SUCH AS
THIS?
>> I CERTAINLY THINK WORDS DO
BETTER AND HAVE POWER.
BUT I TRY AND RETURN TO LOOK AT
THIS THROUGH THE LENS OF
MASCULINITY WHEN I CAN, WHICH IS
MEN IN AMERICA, PARTICULARLY
WHITE MEN, ARE STRUGGLING WITH
SOME VERY ROEAL FACTORS,
ECONOMIC, DISLOCATION, CHANGES
IN SOCIETAL ATTITUDES AND
EXPECTATIONS AROUND MEN AND
MANHOOD.
AND I THINK A LOT OF MEN ARE
STRUGGLING.
I THINK THEY ARE STRUGGLING WITH
THEIR SENSE OF EIDENTITY IN TERS
OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A MAN.
AND HOW TO EXERCISE OR HOW TO
EXPRESS OR HOW TO FEEL FULFILLED
IN TERMS OF BEING A MAN OR IN
TERMS OF WHAT THEIR MANHOOD
MEANS.
AND I THINK UNTIL WE ARE ABLE TO
REALLY FIND NEW WAYS TO HELP MEN
ADJUST TO THESE THINGS AND
DEVELOP NEW UNDERSTANDINGS AND
NEW MODES OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE
A MAN THAT ARE MORE FLEXIBLE
AND -- I THINK WE WILL CONTINUE
TO RUN INTO THESE PROBLEMS.
IF YOU LOOK BACK AT THE LAST
FIVE DECADES IN AMERICA, THIS IS
A DYNAMIC THAT HAS BEEN
EXPLOITED TIME AND AGAIN.
THIS IS NOTHING NEW.
WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH TRUMP IS
PART OF POLITICAL STRATEGY.
YOU COULD TAKE IT ALL OF THE WAY
BACK, BUT IT WAS MORE
SPECIFICALLY EMPLOYED FROM NIXON
ON.
>> GENTLEMEN, IT HAS BEEN A
FASCINATING CONVERSATION.
I WISH I HAD TIME TO TALK WITH
YOU MORE.
ONCE AGAIN, CALLED "HEALING FROM
HATE, BATTLE FOR THE SOUL OF A
NATION."
GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GREAT FILM, THOUGHT PROVOKING
FILM.
I APPRECIATE YOU TAKING TIME TO
TALK WITH US.
BE WELL.
>> THANKS FOR HAVING US.
>> TAKE CARE.
>> "METROFOCUS" IS MADE POSSIBLE
BY
SUE AND EDGAR WACHENHEIM III,
SYLVIA A. AND SIMON B. POYTA
PROGRAMING ENDOWMENT TO FIGHT
ANTI-SEMITISM.
BARBARA HOPE ZUCKERBERG,
JANET PRINDLE SEIDLER,
JODY AND JOHN ARNHOLD,
CHERYL AND PHILIP MILSTEIN
FAMILY,
BERNARD AND DENISE SCHWARTZ,
JUDY AND JOSH WESTON,
DR. ROBERT C. AND TINA SOHN
FOUNDATION.